Do You Need Riggers Liability if You Already Have General Liability?

By Tamir Lerner · Crane Insurance USA · Updated 2026

Quick answer: Yes. General liability and riggers liability cover two different things and do not overlap. GL covers third-party property and injuries but specifically excludes damage to the load you are lifting under the care, custody or control exclusion. Riggers liability covers that load. If your business is picking and setting other people's property, GL alone leaves your most likely serious claim uninsured.

This is one of the most common misunderstandings in crane insurance. An operator carries a solid general liability policy, sees a healthy limit on the declarations page, and assumes the load is covered. Then a sling fails, the customer's equipment hits the ground, and the GL adjuster points to a single exclusion. The claim is denied. Understanding why GL and riggers liability are both necessary can save you from that exact moment.

What general liability actually does

Commercial general liability is broad and essential. It covers third-party bodily injury and property damage arising from your operations, plus completed operations and personal and advertising injury. If your crane swings into a neighboring building, or a bystander is hurt on your site, GL is the policy that responds. Every crane company needs it.

But GL was never designed to cover property you take control of. That is a deliberate design choice, not an oversight, and it is where riggers liability comes in.

The exclusion that creates the need

Standard GL policies exclude damage to property in your care, custody or control. When your crane lifts a customer's rooftop unit, tank, girder, or generator, that property is in your control from the moment it leaves the ground until you set and release it. Insurance references such as IRMI describe care, custody or control as a core property-damage exclusion precisely because liability policies are meant to cover third-party property you do not control, not the property you are handling.

So the very thing a crane company does for a living, take charge of valuable property and move it through the air, is the thing GL carves out. That is not a loophole; it is the intended boundary of the coverage.

What riggers liability adds

Riggers liability covers physical damage to the property you are lifting, rigging, hoisting, or moving while it is in your custody. It attaches exactly where GL stops. Together, the two policies cover the full picture:

SituationGeneral liabilityRiggers liability
Boom swings into a neighbor's buildingCoveredNot needed
Bystander injured by your operationCoveredNot applicable
You drop the customer's loadExcluded (care, custody or control)Covered
You crush the load setting it downExcluded (care, custody or control)Covered

Notice there is no double coverage. Each policy handles losses the other one excludes. That is why "I already have GL" is not a reason to skip riggers, it is the reason you need it.

"But my GL limit is huge"

A large GL limit does not help with an excluded loss. Coverage is a threshold question before it is a limit question: if the care, custody or control exclusion applies, the size of your GL limit is irrelevant because the policy does not respond at all. A $2 million GL limit pays zero on a $500,000 dropped load if that load was in your control. Only riggers liability reaches it.

Who specifically needs both

The only crane operations that might arguably skip riggers are pure bare-rental outfits that never take control of a customer's load, and even they should confirm that with a specialist before assuming.

Contracts are starting to require it

Beyond the coverage logic, more project owners and general contractors now demand proof of riggers liability at a stated limit before a crane mobilizes. They understand the care, custody or control gap and do not want to be left holding a dropped-load loss. Carrying adequate riggers coverage is increasingly a condition of winning serious work, not just good risk management.

Get the limit right, not just the policy

Once you accept that you need riggers liability, the next question is limit adequacy. Your riggers limit should match the value of your heaviest, most expensive lift. Buying a token limit checks a contractual box but still leaves you exposed if you routinely handle loads worth more than the limit. Match the coverage to what you actually pick.

And remember that the best claim is the one you prevent. Operator certification through NCCCO and rigging discipline under OSHA 1926 Subpart CC reduce dropped-load frequency and help you earn better riggers terms.

Have GL but no riggers coverage? Let's fix the gap

Crane Insurance USA coordinates your general liability and riggers liability so the load you lift is actually covered, at a limit sized to your real work.

Request a quote

Or call (818) 356-8150 to review your coverage.

This article is general information, not insurance, legal, or tax advice. Whether a specific loss is covered depends on the exact terms, conditions, and exclusions of your policies. Speak with a licensed agent about your operation.